Symmetries

I'm re-reading "The Symmetries of Things" (Conway, Burgiel, Goodman-Strauss) which starts with a categorization of plane symmetries.

I don't understand, though, why their approach ignores a particular sort of translational symmetry. One of their examples is (ascii-fied):

```... AAAAAA ...
... YYYYYY ...
OOOOOO
AAAAAA
YYYYYY
OOOOOO
AAAAAA
YYYYYY
OOOOOO
```

This has two kinds of "mirror signatures", which they denote **. There is a vertical mirror line between the letters, and a mirror line through the midpoint of the letters. But this doesn't describe the fact that each set of letters repeats vertically as well!

For example, we would expect a nonrepeating infinite vertical stripe to be denoted differently:

```... 888888 ...
... UUUUUU ...
888888
888888
UUUUUU
UUUUUU
888888
888888
888888
UUUUUU
UUUUUU
UUUUUU
.
.
.
```

This has the same mirror symmetries but lacks the translation symmetry. (It's not that they ignore translation--- there is a type composed just of translations--- but don't seem to consider a repeating vertical stripe with two mirror symmetries different from a nonrepeating vertical stripe with two mirror symmetries. Maybe there is a technical reason when they get more formal later on.)

You can see the 17 planar symmetries here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_planar_symmetry_groups

That page suggests the the technical difference is between finite and infinite "fundamental domains". But, ** still seems odd--- all the other groups extend naturally across the plane, but ** needs a translation tacked on.
Tags:
• Post a new comment

Error

default userpic