Mark Gritter (markgritter) wrote,
Mark Gritter

Cavebear's TLD razor

Karl Auerbach tries to draw a distinction between naming and top-level domain ownership. He suggests that ICANN should sell merely the right to have a character string put into the root name servers (a "slot"), and limit itself to enforcing that the owner of said slot operate their next-level name servers with respect to well-established Internet standard. The choice of character string (biz, info, whathaveyou) would not be up to ICANN to decide--- nor, a key point, would it be ICANN's to take away or reassign.

I actually like this proposal quite a bit, because it fits in naturally with the naming system I designed, which has no central root server at all! It shouldn't be ICANN selling slots at all, but ISPs charging to advertise your name to the rest of the world with whatever funny suffix you want.

But we are still stuck with the problem of uniqueness. If I use my slot to sell ".biz" names, nobody else can simultaneously offer ".biz". Auerbach doesn't make clear (in this post) how we should arbitrate competing claims on character strings without falling back to the same problems we have now. First-come-first-serve may in fact be the best we can hope to do, with all its faults.
Tags: dns, geek
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 1 comment