Mark Gritter (markgritter) wrote,
Mark Gritter
markgritter

LP model

I posted the model file I'm using for the TD last-round problem here.

It runs under the the GNU Linear Programming Kit (GLPK) like this:
glpsol -m 8642K-vs-7432Q.mod -o outputfile

Thanks for any comments you guys have.

On the sometimes-fold-the-best-hand front, Alex Selby has some weasel words in his README that may be applicable:


BTW exercise: if you run an=0 bl=1 it tells you that the big blind should
fold some hands (e.g. 42s) when the small blind has only called, so the
big blind could have checked it out for a free showdown, but decides to
muck his hand. Why is this not necessarily a bug? (This had me worried
before I realised what was happening.)

Alex

[Answer: because in this situtation small blind should fold or raise,
never call. The only way to exploit BB's "mistake" of mucking 42s after
a call, is for SB to call with something some of the time. But this
presumably works out as a bigger "mistake". This is an example of a
degenerate optimal strategy, and the program picking a non-intuitive
representative. It could equally well have said "check" with 42s, but
it is being confusing because it hasn't yet been instructed not to be.
Another (simpler) example of something similar is numbers vs numbers
using the parameters d=2 nr=1 an=0 bl=1, where BB may muck 0 after a SB
call.]



It's certainly possible that something similar is what's going on in my case as well. I do know that if the pot is large enough those folds go away, and artificially constraining B's strategy to never fold his 76432 and 75432 hands does not decrease his EV in smaller pots.
Tags: code, lowball, poker, theory
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 18 comments