Mark Gritter (markgritter) wrote,
Mark Gritter
markgritter

Once more... PLO short stacks

Can somebody please explain in terms that are simple enough for me to understand, whether all the people getting uber-nitty about short-stack PLO players have a legitimite gripe or not? (Like this 2+2 thread where somebody accuses a bunch of short-stack players of being bots.)

"If they were good they would play for a full buy-in" is just nittiness.

"They remove all the play from the game" (because they are typically all-in on the flop) is just nittiness--- play limit instead. ;)

The closest I've come is someone complaining that other people playing short-stacked interferes with the big stack's ability to extract value from other deep stacks. (Without, presumably, benefitting the short stack as much as it hurts the big stack.) Which I'm not quite seeing, but what do I know, I'm just a stupid limit player.
Tags: omaha, poker
Subscribe
  • Post a new comment

    Error

    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.
  • 5 comments