Mark Gritter (markgritter) wrote,
Mark Gritter


Hello, readers.

My current practice has been to friends-lock most poker content using a filter. This includes both play results (hand histories, etc.) and some of the "experimental" work on Chinese Poker and Triple Draw. Though a fair number of posts about the latter are left public. (If you are not on the poker filter and would like to be, please leave a note.)

There are a couple reasons for this; one is that I have some non-poker readers. Another is that I want to be able to gossip about other players, or at least get candid advice about hands they were in. :) Finally, some of the research I don't feel is at the point where it should be released and propogated "out of context." But, I do feel like I could do a better job at publicizing and separating out the latter.

I have been giving some thought to following ts4z's model and separating out poker blogging, or research blogging, into a separate community. My current thought is that it would work better for the research side than the poker-playing, as I would still want to friends-lock many hand histories, and it doesn't make sense setting up a whole new members-only community.

What would you like to see? Would it be a good idea to start a "lowballgurus" community for posting work-in-progress? I think I would feel better about leaving all research-related posts unlocked there. Would you prefer a poker-only blog?
Tags: meta, poker
  • Post a new comment


    default userpic

    Your reply will be screened

    Your IP address will be recorded 

    When you submit the form an invisible reCAPTCHA check will be performed.
    You must follow the Privacy Policy and Google Terms of use.